20221024

22 October, 2022

I'm feeling rather feckfull today, how unusual.

□ [“Doctors are Baffled After 18-Year-Old Indiana Athlete Suffers Cardiac Arrest During Tennis Practice"]

So they're in on it.  Otherwise they would be looking at what all these dead/injured teenagers have in common and they would be looking to other doctors around the world who are flat-out banning patients from taking the chemical that all these dead/injured teenagers have taken.

They've all taken this poison and they're dying from it.  You can either tell the truth or you can keep doing what you've been doing and watch them die.  The death toll will not go down.  What are you paid for?

Is it actively demon-worship or are the demons just taking them over?  How else could so many people go through their whole medical careers and then suddenly do this?  For that matter, what about the government officials who demanded everybody get stabbed with this poison?  None of them are saying 'stop, this is bad for your health!'  Because they aren't interested in that.

We can see this with their push for abortion up through the umpteenth trimester, there's no way they can push for all of this *and* take the voters seriously but they're clearly pushing for this.

Short of demon possession, there's simply no way these people could be going this direction accidentally-but-uniformly and without hesitation.  They pay staffers to look at what could go wrong with their promotions, or at least they used to.  As with the doctors specifically avoiding obvious medical facts, they can't be doing this by accident.

It is true that the government is threatening to take away their licenses so there is clearly some obedience going on, but by this point, one would expect them to be unified for resistance.

□ [“Microsoft just dropped the latest Pride flag design, and yes, IT'S REAL"]

You may have noticed the last few years of gay flags [I SAID FLAGS!!!] with an increasing amount of color, and with nothing else to get paid for, Microsoft has expanded it to this.  Many people point out that it's like the climax of 2001:  A Space Odyssey.  Or at least the Spaceballs parody, "they've gone to plaid!"

This flag combines 40 different flags from LGBTQIA+ communities around the world, including: Abrosexual, Aceflux, Agender, Ambiamorous, Androgynous, Aroace, Aroflux, Aromantic, Asexual, Bigender, Bisexual, Demifluid, Demigender, Demigirl, Demiromantic, Demisexual, Gay/MLM/Vinician, Genderfluid, Genderflux, Genderqueer, Gender questioning, Graysexual, Intersex, Lesbian, Maverique, Neutrois, Nonbinary, Omnisexual, Pangender, Pansexual, Polyamorous, Polysexual, Transgender, Trigender, Two Spirit, Progress Pride, Queer, Unlabeled.

Which color stands for which of these?  Who has nothing else to do with their lives but figure out what any of these terms are, much less memorize them, much less know which color goes with what?  Most of the colors are very light, only a few are dark.  Probably a coincidence.

Like everything else, it seems to be about destroying the whole concept of individuality.  You have to deal with other people just to figure out what all these made-up genders mean.  Then there's being sexually attracted to other people, you can't do that by yourself, no matter how hard you try.

But you can put people in jail for disagreeing with you on gender.  Collectivists do turn on each other quite often, it's one of their fundamental character traits.  They can also do whatever they want to anybody, although they prefer kids.

One thing to remember about the left is that, as collectivists, they aren't able to make their own individual plans or anything to focus on.  It's always about pointing at other people and usually trying to take them down for any reason they can make up.

The main exception is that they automatically worship the rulers.  This can be changed but I'm not sure how or why.  I've noticed that nobody seemed to miss Obama after he left, they were all focused on Hillary not successfully stealing an election.  They also are specifically blank about Biden's obvious problems, as though at one level he's already gone as far as they're concerned.  At another level they'll worship him as the ruler but this is just strange.

In theory, a normal person could genuinely support Biden for whatever reason, but they'd also be capable of admitting that there are problems.  He says the vaccine will prevent you from getting the virus, he says Russia won't invade Ukraine, he says the economy is doing great, all of which we can see is blatantly false.  He's either lying or has no clue what he's talking about but, technically a real person could still support Biden and his people, although they would admit there are problems.

You can support Trump and be fully aware that he's an arrogant asshole.  The orange skin and fake hair looked stupid and his speech patterns are just strange.  He does whatever the hell he does and is aware that he needs to show actual results, which he's been successful at for decades.  That's how individuals see problems and make-do with what they have.  That's what collectivists avoid at all costs.

That's why I think our rulers have figured out another step to dominate the masses which is why they're not the slightest-bit concerned about the upcoming election thefts.  Something will always go wrong but it's where I do think they've made preparations.  They may even have a plan to accuse Republicans of stealing elections if the votes go against them.  But we need to be prepared and we need to strike back as soon as possible, to show them that this will never ever be allowed again.

23 October, 2022

If they're not showing any worry about voters judging the last two years, what makes you think they'd support making sure voters get to choose?  These mentally ill people could steal the election and make it illegal to say they didn't win fair-and-square.

□ [“Fully Vaxxed and Boosted CDC Director Rochelle Walensky Catches COVID One Month After Her Latest Booster Shot"]

Five days ago, I quoted several people saying that the vaccine prevented you from getting the virus and she was the only one I didn't know had gotten the virus.  That was mostly because I was too lazy to check.  Well, never mind, that's a clean sweep of our rulers not having a clue what the so-called vaccine actually does even though they want everyone else to put it into our bodies.

So are they lying or are they just stupid?  Maybe they just don't know anything about the virus, but then that makes it even worse that they pretend to have a vaccine.  They're basically treating people like cattle, with the same outcome.  They're not remotely curious about all the healthy young people dropping dead.

□ [“Monet Painting in Germany Is Latest Target of Unhinged Climate Activists"]

Other than showing off how stupid the attackers are and how they expect everything to do what they say, what is this supposed to accomplished?  These attacks are clearly organized, the people doing them wouldn't be able to think of something this complicated by themselves, but what is the point?

You have to think some old painting is important, then make plans to get the paint and get into the museum.  Just picking which painting to go after would be more complicated than these creatures can accomplish by themselves.

And they glue themselves to the floor.  Just the use of glue and paint shows how little they know about how important oil is but they go ahead and do it anyway.  Frankly, I think there should be an example, just leave them there.  Close that room in the museum for at least a few days.

It's not like they can complain, they said they'd do this until they get what they wanted.  They haven't gotten what they wanted so that's on them.  They could have thought of a better plan but they committed themselves to this one.

I've heard that at least one of the attacked museums had done this but I'm saying it should be a standard policy.  I'm fine with letting them starve to death although I assume others would disagree, but the word would get out that all they do is make themselves suffer.  Oh, you can't see Monet or the Mona Lisa right now?  Darnit, you'll just have to look them up on the internet.

These creatures don't get to eat for a couple weeks and they're the ones who stuck themselves to the floor.  That's a fair trade.  You can film it and sell the video for us to watch.

□ [“Biden Inches Closer to WWIII:  US Troops on Ukraine-Romania Border in 'Combat Deployment' Prepare to Invade and Fight Russian Forces in Ukraine"]

What happened to Russia being totally defeated for the last eight months?  It's impossible to go to war against a nation that's had its military totally destroyed and the media has been assuring us that's exactly what's happened all this time, every step of the way, no exceptions.  Ukraine totally dominates Russia on the battlefield and Russia has absolutely no military left anywhere in the entire country.

□ [“WWIII Update:  Warnings of Possible Dirty Nuclear Bomb Attack in Ukraine"]

So now we're up to nukes and there's no reason to believe any of it.  Ukraine, Russia and the US government can all be blamed just as easily.  Or maybe they're making this all up in the first place.  In theory, Ukraine couldn't do this because they gave up their nukes, but dirty bombs are a different thing and anyway, given all the weapons and money the US has handed over this year, they could get them.

The US is sending ground troops to neighboring countries, what a coincidence.  I hope we're sending the transgender soldiers in first, so they can show what they're about.

□ [“Nancy Pelosi: 'When I Hear People Talk About Inflation…We Have to Change the Subject!'"]

A woman that rich doesn't permit people around her to speak about things she doesn't like.  She doesn't notice inflation and is offended if others do.

And that's why she's still in charge of the House.  She doesn't permit anyone around her who dares to say something she doesn't want to hear.

Also 23 October, 2022

Beelzebub has a vaccination put aside for me, for me, for meeeeeeeee...

□ [Queen - "Face It Alone" (Official Lyric Video)]

Well, there's a new Queen song.  It's actually been out for over a week but that's how little attention I pay to pop culture anymore.  It's Queen and I didn't rush for it?  What kind of world are we living in where that happens?

The song itself isn't that interesting.  It was from The Miracle sessions.  I would have picked it over "My Baby Does Me" but that's not saying much.  It's Queen so it does sound wonderful, back when actual music was made.  It doesn't work well as a song.  The lyrics are ok but they go nowhere.

This does indicate that there's basically nothing left in the vault.  If this was the best they had to release as a single, they don't have much else.  There's a little leeway, they could require a unanimous vote to work on anything.  They may have basic standards and any song that doesn't make it back then and can't be polished now simply doesn't make the list.  That's kind of iffy, they can't put together random Freddie vocals and make an actual song out of it, or at least something worth listening to for three or four minutes?  They didn't record any covers in the studio during all those years?

Ok, probably not that last one.  We don't get to know the details of Queen's business operations but they were clearly very specific about songwriting.  Only four songs on all their albums had any writers who weren't band-members.  The first album had a song Brian co-wrote before Queen formed.  The tenth album had a duet with David Bowie who gets a pass.  The fourteenth album had a track Freddie co-wrote for a solo project that wasn't used and the fifteenth had a song Brian co-wrote that wasn't used during Freddie's life precisely because Queen had policies against outside songwriters.

I'm sure that had to change when Freddie was dying but I assume Queen still had to own the song for studio recordings, so they wouldn't have wasted time and money on covers.  Right from the start, Queen understood that.  They recorded their first album song-by-song, then when it was finished, looked for a record contract.

So as a result, there's a reason they wouldn't have much left.  There may be some tracks that the band had tried and then came out on solo albums, but even there, Roger did more solo albums than the others combined and most of his were with a side-band he'd formed so the whole point was that Queen wasn't an option.  So short of them remaking Freddie's solo work - which I would totally love - there's not much else left.

Queen has proven that they need Freddie's vocals to count and he hasn't done any of those for thirty years, almost as few as Axl Rose.

Speaking of G'n'R, whom I am strangely more obsessed with than Queen or any other band I like more, a month or so ago, some internet sites went nuts insisting that there was going to be a new release any time.  There was nothing in the way of evidence, just a bizarre obsession.

 But, possibly in response to this, Slash has given an interview where he actually mentions his employer and the possibility of new music.  As usual, there's nothing specific and little difference from what Axl's hired hands have said for the last thirty years.  Really the only difference is that this is from someone who was in the band back when it had multiple co-owners.

"I want to go in and cut a whole brand new record at some point, probably sooner than later."

Six and a half-years and they haven't gotten around to an album.  Slash has done two solo albums in that time, that's where his attention goes if he actually wants a brand new album.  By the way, except for the cover of "Sympathy for the Devil," G'n'R's whole recording career lasted about six and a half-years.

That is not how "probably sooner than later" works.

"We have stuff that we still got to come out, so that’s gonna be coming out piecemeal over the next… I don’t know, over the next few months or something like that."

So there's already stuff that *could* have been released, if you actually wanted to release it, if you actually had anything to release.  You could just put it on Youtube if that's all you needed.  Given the lack of success for any new G'n'R release since 1991, this would just make it convenient for everybody.

"There’s a handful of those songs that we actually fixed up and did when we were in lockdown. So those have yet to be released, so those are gonna come out. They’re really good, too, so I’m excited for those. We’re just gonna put out, like, one or two songs, and then another one or two songs. I think that’s gonna be pretty much all of them; I’m not sure exactly how many we did in total."

It's unclear if he's referring to the two songs that came out last year, but at most, that's six songs total.  Well, he's also not sure how many they did, perhaps Slash just can't count to six.  But that's all you found to work with from the fourteen years of Chinese Democracy recording sessions?

My guess is Axl wasn't capable of doing vocals, or just too lazy.  Either way, that leaves nothing to go with.  I suppose it's possible that Slash and Duff may have heard crap that wasn't even good enough for CD, but given everything else, I think they'd have at least run through some recording sessions with it, just to put their names on it and have it technically count as "Guns'n'Roses."

I've been wondering if the purpose of G'n'R was to increase the cult-like behavior of its fans.  How is it possible to still fill stadiums around the world with this empty career?  How is it possible to love Appetite For Destruction so much that you'll pay tons of money to watch a few people recreate it?  I certainly like the album but I can just put it on 'play' here at home, much cheaper.

But there are people who are still this obsessed.  Whatever the merits of the real band, this is just ridiculous.

24 October, 2022

Only two weeks before another stolen election...

I'm not sure if it's the right word, but emotion can be described as "movement."  You can have it by yourself, it's normal when a girl dumps you or something like that, but it "works" better when dealing with other people.  It's mentally starting in one place and moving to another.  Of course there's no reason for it but after the fact, you can conceive of how and why it happened.

Leftists are powered by emotion, not thought.  The image I'm picturing is college students, sitting around and talking and feeling very proud of themselves for such a thing.  They can claim they have made plans 'for the future,' but the effect is still the same without having to accomplish anything.

This is what politicians aim for, they can get votes by making people 'feel good' at the moment.  This also helps leftists say that anyone with actual thoughts is 'racist' or 'fascist' or whatever their latest terminology is.  This also makes it easy to assume that leftists have no actual plans.  Even if they do, they never bother going through with it whenever they don't feel good.  The effect is the same.

□ [“British Man Becomes First to Get Microchipped with Bank Card"]

Not the first European, just the first Brit.  And as always, there is the mind-boggling 'what the hell are they thinking?'  Your employer and your bank already have access to your money, now your surgeon and the company that provides surgical products has access.  They can shut it off for any reason that comes to their mind.

If you're falsely accused of something, how are you going to buy food or pay rent while you're trying to disprove it?  You'll have to wait until the judge gets around to deciding in court that you can actually use that microchip the way you intended.  And that's not counting anything else that can go wrong.  Are you going to keep getting implants every year to get the new model?

Oh, the article says you'd have to do that when the power runs out.  How nice.  Or creepy, whichever.

□ [“Greenpeace finds most plastics aren't recyclable"]

That's the point.  They want to make up 'recycling' which doesn't exist and impose that on everyone else.  95% of plastic simply cannot be reused.  This is the same nonsense they've been doing with global warming, and for about as long too.

That's why they're suddenly imposing us to use paper bags when they spent decades insisting we should 'save the trees' and not use paper bags.  The only results that matter are their control over us.

Why don't the people who want to defund the police just demand that the government get rid of laws?  Then there would be nothing for police to do, so you could close them down.  This is an indication of how our rulers actually work.

They have to make laws or they have nothing to enforce, but they need to keep their allies from living under the same requirements as the rest of us.  By making the very concept unrealistic, they can send men with guns after anyone they don't like while anyone they do like can get away with anything.

This is where 'keep it simple, stupid' comes from.  Sensible people know that everybody acts in different way, so if you're going to impose something, the point is to keep it as simple and universal as possible, so that anybody could understand it.

Have they actually made any progress at their level?  That's hard to comprehend, much less answer.  Is defining people by skin color their main goal or is it just an excuse to set-up blacks-only locations and hate whitey?  Hispanics and Asians are now accused of being white, which isn't helping anybody, but everyone else recognizes that.  It's just leftists who don't.

But they do seem to have come up with something.  The "critical race theory" seems to be the best example of this but again, is that an actual form of progress that they can expand on or is it just an excuse to seize power?  You could say the same thing about Das Kapital, it gets all the credit after-the-fact but the leftists had always been trying to take over.

□ [“Biden on His Unconstitutional Student Loan Bailout: 'It Passed. I Got it Passed by a Vote or Two"]

My "a vote or two" he means "zero" because Congress has never voted on it.  This basically shows how confident Democrats are in the election results, nobody's remotely bothered by him making this nonsense up.  It's safe to assume Biden has no clue what happened, the only question is if he genuinely thinks Congress voted on something or if he was just told to say this and he obeyed.

If we had a real media, someone might ask "are any of these people who voted for it in the room with us now?"  Just to see what he says.  But that would give away too much, the media isn't there for that.

The guy already said Russia wouldn't invade Ukraine and the vaccine would prevent you from getting the virus.  He says he has nothing to do with gas prices and demands credit when they go down.  It's like the real rulers picked him as the front man precisely because he's stupid enough to say this stuff without question.

□ [“WH Says Biden Was Referring to Inflation Reduction Act When He Falsely Claimed Student Loan Forgiveness Plan Passed 'By a Vote or Two'"]

He doesn't know the difference between inflation and student loans?  That's pretty stupid of him.  Why don't you just make up cue cards so he doesn't need to rely on whatever self-identifies as his brain?

They're trying to pretend he was actually talking about something completely different that he hadn't mentioned at all in the discussion on camera.  Why did they even permit questions in the first place, of Biden or his staff?

Who is supposed to believe any of this?  It's like they're just trying to keep their peasants busy pretending to do something, which is common among marxist governments.

Also 24 October, 2022

So here's an example of why Facebook sucks.  On April 22, 2021, I posted "I'll kill Jim Steinman if he doesn't come back."  Now you might not be maintaining your Steinman-worship temple but that's your problem, nobody else's.

How stupid do you have to be to ban something you don't remotely comprehend?  We can assume that this wasn't something real people spent a year and a half investigating before they banned my post, it was probably bots, which were programmed by people stupid enough to do this.

It takes very little effort to ask who Jim Steinman is.  Facebook would be the very first place for Facebook to check and a basic search shows Jim Steinman died on April 19, 2021.  Three days before my post which was so offensive.  You have to go out of your way to avoid the connection of a dead person being killed if he doesn't come back from the dead.

Could there be any other connection, the not-stupid person might ask themselves before banning a comment made a year and a half ago, a connection between this dead Jim Steinman and being killed if someone doesn't come back from something?

It's still a very easy search on Facebook to see that Jim Steinman was a songwriter, most notably known for his work with Meat Loaf and Meat Loaf even did a song called "I'll Kill You If You Don't Come Back."  Do you suppose there's any connection to this song and Jim Steinman dying three days before I made this post about killing him if he doesn't come back?

And of course, the slightest check of any of these details shows that, yes, Steinman did write that song.  So three days after he died, I said I'll kill the guy who wrote the song I'm quoting if he doesn't return from the dead.  And that's offensive.

You have to actively look for ways to be offended and, a year and a half later, you finally find something, so you can ban what offended you.  That is liberal tyranny.  There's no better way to put it, what, you want to say "fascism"?

And that's how Facebook wants it which is exactly the same as every other liberal.  They expect everyone to act like their bots, looking for ways to be offended so they can ban anything they don't like.